When Quicken 2015 was introduced last fall, there were the usual improvements to the Windows version, while the user reviews on Amazon seemed, on the whole, similar to the previous year's. Last Updated: September 8, 2016. How To Watch The Canelo vs Fielding Fight For Free. Quicken 2018 For Mac Review: Now Subscription Only. Was the first to report that such a move was in the pipeline shortly after the release of the Canadian version of Quicken 2017 for Mac although Quicken Inc later denied any decision. Click to expand.My file has ballooned to 100mb. I remember during one update it almost doubled in size. I may have a lot of data (not necessarily lots of 0's) but that is some inefficient file management for just literally number data. The Intuit Quicken was just awful in this way. No efficiency or stability or even attention to the product. I was thrilled to hear about new ownership where Quicken would be the core focus. That's odd you find the interface much different. Eset nod32 antivirus for mac review. However, it tanked our antiphishing test this time around, it's expensive, and it lacks full tech support. Bottom Line: Symantec Norton AntiVirus Basic gets good scores from the independent labs and very good scores in most of our hands-on tests. I've only heard it's fairly similar. Either way, different doesn't concern me but worse does. I just double checked my file, and it is actually 12.5MB. However, I only use Quicken for simple things like monitoring monthly bills, paying them, and see my cash flow (or lack of), weekly/monthly. ![]() I know Quicken can process cheques, budgets, taxes (to a degree) and such, but, I don't use none of those features. When I say Quicken for Mac is different to Windows, what I mean is, the layout is slightly different. I've been using Quicken for Windows since the last update to Microsoft's Money 2008, back in early 2009. So, I'm just used to the layout of the Windows version. Surely after a few pay cycles, I'lll be just fine. My file has ballooned to 100mb. I remember during one update it almost doubled in size. I may have a lot of data (not necessarily lots of 0's) but that is some inefficient file management for just literally number data. The Intuit Quicken was just awful in this way. No efficiency or stability or even attention to the product. I was thrilled to hear about new ownership where Quicken would be the core focus. That's odd you find the interface much different. I've only heard it's fairly similar. Gmail configuring for mac mail. Either way, different doesn't concern me but worse does. I just double checked my file, and it is actually 12.5MB. However, I only use Quicken for simple things like monitoring monthly bills, paying them, and see my cash flow (or lack of), weekly/monthly. I know Quicken can process cheques, budgets, taxes (to a degree) and such, but, I don't use none of those features. When I say Quicken for Mac is different to Windows, what I mean is, the layout is slightly different. I've been using Quicken for Windows since the last update to Microsoft's Money 2008, back in early 2009. So, I'm just used to the layout of the Windows version. Surely after a few pay cycles, I'lll be just fine. Click to expand.There is lots of unexpected stuff in the package. Mine is about 120MB but only about 90MB is 'data'. Most of the rest is in a subfolder named 'converted' which has information about the import from Quicken for Windows. If I were in a space crunch I might try deleting that and see what happens. I do have a Hazel action that takes any Quicken backups I make, compresses them into a ZIP archive, and moves them to an archive folder on my server. That cuts the space needed by about 50%. Click to expand.I'm actually not that concerned about the size, so I won't need to do file size rationing. But, I was talking about the file itself, not the folder contents or anything else. I think it's just plain inefficient. Mac pro versions. It's not a huge concern as far as impact to me, but it does say something about the quality of the product IMHO. One of the many reasons the Intuit version of Quicken bothered me. As soon as I get a free day to allocate for setting up, I plan on getting the new Mac version. I know that's worst case scenario planning, but I don't want to leave it half done. I upgraded yesterday from Quicken 2015 for the Mac to Quicken Mac 2017. Upgrade was seamless. I like the automated backup feature. I find the visual presentation better and more 'Mac like'. I don't like the pencil icon next to s manually entered transaction. Just another step. I find the reconciliation better. My needs are very simple. I only use Quicken to track my Checking and Savings accounts. I don't use it to track investments. I don't use the bill pay option or anything related to credit cards. I mainly use the Category Sumnary report. For me, in terms of what I use Quicken for, all of the versions, including Essentials, would suffice. Am I happy I upgraded? Even if we are very basic users, and do not take advantage of the features in 2017, I think it's important to support the product, by periodically upgrading. In this way, people who use more of the features, would be more likely to have them when they need them. I might feel differently, had I not purchased the upgrade during their 40% sale.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |